Panama Case Complete Verdict

0
239
Panama Case Complete Verdict | thenewstribe.com

ISLAMABAD – Supreme Court of Pakistan (SCP) on Friday issued complete verdict of Panama Case soon after the announcement of the reserved decission.

Below you can read the Panama Case Complete Verdict:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN
(ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)
PRESENT:
MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN
MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED
MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN
C. M. A. NO. 4978 OF 2017 IN CONSTITUTION PETITION NO. 29 OF 2016 ETC.
(Report by JIT).
AND
C. M. A. NO. 2939 OF 2017 IN CONSTITUTION PETITION NO. 29 OF 2016 ETC.
Imran Ahmed Khan and others. …Applicant(s)
Versus
Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif,
Prime Minister of Pakistan. …Respondent(s)
AND
CONSTITUTION PETITION NO. 29 OF 2016.
(Under Article 184 of the Constitution)
Imran Ahmed Khan Niazi. …Petitioner(s)
Versus
Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif,
Prime Minister of Pakistan, etc. …Respondent(s)
AND
CONSTITUTION PETITION NO. 30 OF 2016.
(Under Article 184 of the Constitution)
Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed. …Petitioner(s)
Versus
Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Law,
Justice and Parliamentary Division, etc. …Respondent(s)
AND
CONSTITUTION PETITION NO. 03 OF 2017.
(Under Article 184 of the Constitution)
Siraj-ul-Haq, Ameer Jamat-e-Islami, Pakistan. …Petitioner(s)
Versus
Federation of Pakistan through Ministry of
Parliamentary Affairs, Islamabad and others. …Respondent(s)
………………
Const. Ps. No. 29-30/2016 & 03/2017. 2
IN ATTENDANCE.
(in Const. P. 29/2016).
For the petitioner(s): Syed Naeem Bokhari, ASC
Mr. Sikandar Bashir Mohmand, ASC
Mr. Fawad Hussain Ch., ASC
Mr. Faisal Fareed Hussain, ASC.
Ch. Akhtar Ali, AOR.
Assisted by :
Barrister Maleeka Bokhari.
Shahid Naseem Gondal, Adv.
Kashif Nawaz Siddiqui, Adv.
M. Imad Khan, Adv.
For respdt. No. 1: Khawaja Harris Ahmed, Sr. ASC.
Assisted by:
M. Amjad Pervaiz, ASC
Saad Hashmi, Adv.
Adnan Khawaja, Adv.
For respdt. No. 2: Mr. Akbar Tarar, APGA.
Mr. Arshad Qayyum, Spl. Prosecutor.
Ch. M. Fariid-ul-Hassan, Spl. Prosecutor.
Mr. Imran-ul-Haq, Spl. Prosecutor.
Mr. Ajmal Aziz, Spl. Prosecutor.
For respdts. 3 to 5 : Mr. M. Waqar Rana, Addl. A. G.
Mr. M. S. Khattak, AOR.
Assisted by :
Barrister Asad Rahim Khan.
For respdts. 6 to 9: Mr. Salman Akram Raja, ASC.
Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, AOR.
Assisted by :
Asad Ladha, Adv.
Ghulam Sabir Malik, Adv.
Usman Ali Bhoon, Adv.
M. Shakeel Mughal, Adv.
Aftab Zafar, Adv.
For respdt. No. 10: Dr. Tariq Hassan, ASC.
Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, AOR.
Const. P. 30 of 2016.
For the petitioner(s): Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed, (in person)
For the respdts. 1 & 3: Mr. M. Waqar Rana, Addl. A. G.
Mr. M. S. Khattak, AOR.
Const. Ps. No. 29-30/2016 & 03/2017. 3
Assisted by :
Barrister Asad Rahim Khan.
For respdt. No. 2 : Mr. Akbar Tarar, APGA.
Mr. Arshad Qayyum, Spl. Prosecutor.
Ch. M. Fariid-ul-Hassan, Spl. Prosecutor.
Mr. Imran-ul-Haq, Spl. Prosecutor.
Mr. Ajmal Aziz, Spl. Prosecutor.
For respdt. No. 4: Khawaja Harris Ahmed, Sr. ASC.
Assisted by:
M. Amjad Pervaiz, ASC
Saad Hashmi, Adv.
Adnan Khawaja, Adv.
Const. P. No. 03 of 2017.
For the petitioner(s): Mr. Taufiq Asif, ASC.
Assisted by :
Atif Ali Khan, ASC.
Ajmal Ghaffar Toor, Adv.
Saifullah Gondal, Adv.
Sher Hamad Khan, Adv.
For respdts. 1 to 3: Mr. M. Waqar Rana, Addl. A. G.
Mr. M. S. Khattak, AOR.
Assisted by :
Barrister Asad Rahim Khan.
For respdt. No. 4: Khawaja Harris Ahmed, Sr. ASC.
Assisted by:
M. Amjad Pervaiz, ASC
Saad Hashmi, Adv.
Adnan Khawaja, Adv.
Date of Hearing: 17th to 21st July, 2017.
(Judgment Reserved).
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.

Const. Ps. No. 29-30/2016 & 03/2017. 4
J U D G M E N T

EJAZ AFZAL KHAN, J.- This judgment is in continuation of our judgments dated 20.04.2017 in Constitution Petitions No. 29, 30 of 2016 and Constitution Petition No. 03 of 2017 which ended up in the following order of
the Court :
“By a majority of 3 to 2 (Asif Saeed Khan Khosa and Gulzar Ahmed, JJ) dissenting, who have given separate declarations and directions, we hold that the questions how did Gulf Steel Mill come into being; what led to its sale; what happened to its liabilities; where did its sale proceeds end up; how did they reach Jeddah, Qatar and the U.K.;
whether respondents No. 7 and 8 in view of their tender ages had the means in the early nineties to possess and purchase the flats; whether sudden appearance of the letters of Hamad Bin Jassim Bin Jaber Al-Thani is a myth or a reality; how bearer shares crystallized into the flats; who, in fact, is the real and beneficial owner of M/s Nielsen
Enterprises Limited and Nescoll Limited, how did Hill Metal Establishment come into existence; where did the money for Flagship Investment Limited and other companies set up/taken over by respondent No. 8 come from, and where did the Working Capital for such companies come from and where do the huge sums running into
millions gifted by respondent No. 7 to respondent No. 1 drop in from, which go to the heart of the matter and need to be answered.

Therefore, a thorough investigation in this behalf is required.

Read Panama Case Complete Decission in Urdu HERE

For Complete Verdict on Panama Case VISIT HERE

NO COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY