Army ‘moving toward’ opening combat arms to women, says Odierno

Print Friendly and PDF

Photo: US Department of Defence

Washington: Army leaders are asking whether—and how—to open infantry and armour ranks to women, the service’s senior soldier said today.

Officers in charge of training and force development are now gathering data to help answer those questions, Army Chief of Staff Gen. Raymond T. Odierno told reporters during a Pentagon briefing.

In line with Defence Secretary Leon E. Panetta’s policy, the service has already opened 13,000 previously all-male positions to female soldiers, the general noted.

“Earlier this week more than 200 women began reporting to the manoeuvre battalions in nine of our brigade combat teams, selected to participate in the exception to the direct ground combat assignment rule,” he said. “Additionally, co-location [with combat units] as an assignment restriction is rescinded.”

A Defence Department report to Congress in February outlining the assignment policy changes included a vision statement that said the department “is committed to removing all barriers that would prevent service members from rising to the highest level of responsibility that their talents and capabilities warrant.”

Odierno noted the changes open new opportunities to women, who comprise 16 percent of the Army’s ranks. “This revision … allows us to leverage the tremendous talent resident in our ranks,” he added.

Women will likely filter in to the new positions for “several months,” the Army chief said. Two categories of assignments are now open to women: jobs such as tank mechanic and field artillery radar operator that are necessarily performed close to combat units, and a limited “exception to policy” opening select positions at the battalion level in jobs women already occupy.

“My guess is, based on my experience in Iraq and what I’ve seen in Afghanistan, we’ll then move forward with a more permanent solution [involving those two assignment categories] inside of the Army probably sometime this fall,” he said.

Odierno said the next step is “to look at, do we open up infantry and armour [military occupational specialties] to females?”

He emphasized no decisions have yet been made on the question, but noted the answer will have implications for all-male Army formations, including the Rangers.

Army Rangers are rapidly deployable, light infantry troops trained to engage conventional and special operations targets. While there are only three Ranger battalions, with a special troops battalion and a separate Ranger training brigade, Odierno pointed out the “Ranger tab” denoting completion of Ranger training is a key to advancement among infantry officers.

Ranger school consists of three phases — mountain, desert and swamp – over 61 days, and combines rigorous infantry training with famously sparse amounts of food and sleep.

While Odierno cautioned, “I don’t want to get ahead of myself,” he noted that some 90 percent of Army senior infantry officers — all male — are Ranger-qualified.

“So, if we determine that we’re going to allow women to go into infantry, to be successful they are probably, at some time, going to have to go through Ranger school,” he said. “We have not made that decision, but it’s a factor that I’ve asked them to take a look at.”

If combat arms jobs open to female soldiers, “We want the women to be successful,” the general said.

The Army, like DOD, is committed to providing maximum opportunity for its members, Odierno said.

“We’re going to move toward it,” he said. “It’s how we do that, what we have to do, [that we’re assessing] as we move forward.”

This post originally created by Karen Parrish











facebook twitter pinterest linkdin googleplus youtube email print

  • Palerider775

    Our Generals are too concerned with retaining their jobs and remaining in the military and because of that, they are cowardly bending over and dropping their drawers to receive the “will” of their superiors, Obama’s political appointees. If women were to attend Ranger school and if the school would not alter nor lower their standards to accomodate them, fine. Unfortunately, our Generals will lower the standard to ensure women pass and receive this coveted tab because after all, that’s what President Obama wants. The military has turned into one big social experiment and I’m glad that I am retired because I see absolutely zero courage from our Army’s most senior officers corps. Cowards; all of them. I hope the next Administration fires all of our top general officers…

  • Chris Johnson

    I personally do not agree with this move at this point in time.  Although I have seen several women do the same job in combat better than a man, this is not the norm.  The times I have viewed this is when the men doing the same job is terrible and the female is mediocre in terms of male performance.  Often women doing the job of a male at a mediocre level on the male scale will be viewed as exceptional to superiors.
     
    For example, if a female officer makes a perfect score on a male physical fitness test, she is considered brilliant.  If a male officer makes a perfect score on a male physical fitness test, it is expected.  There is nothing saying that exceptional women cannot compete with exceptional men both physically and mentally, but this is an exception. 
     
    There are way too many double standards in favor of women that will skew statistics.  If women want equality in the military ranks, double standards need to be eliminated.  If women want equality in society they need to sign up selective service.  I am fine with equal rights for women, but they need to be fully equal.  The same goes for the military.  I believe women should have every opportunity, but they are at a genetic disadvantage when it comes to the military.  Cut all double standards then let them compete for slots to go to Ranger school and become maneuver commanders.
     
    Unfortunately, we are too political for this.  If we make a standard that will be the same for men and women, the 17% of women in the Army’s ranks will drop significantly, due to them not being able to hack it.  This will not look good to congress, nor will it look good for those Generals who are evaluated by congress. 
     
    “Okay congress, we will let females in to Ranger School and hype it up, but you must let us keep funding our military strength abroad” Fair deal?

  • Pingback: Bt-US may send women to Ranger school- top Army chief » Trust News





Social News

FOLLOW US

Most Popular

Opinion Polls

  • Are you satisfied with results of Election 2013 Pakistan?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...